<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 12 STI&#8217;s of Christmas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coldspaghetti.org/blog/2008/12/13/12-stis-of-christmas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coldspaghetti.org/blog/2008/12/13/12-stis-of-christmas/</link>
	<description>Thaw before reheating.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.coldspaghetti.org/blog/2008/12/13/12-stis-of-christmas/comment-page-1/#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldspaghetti.org/blog/?p=3241#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>Hi Hill Rat, thanks for your thoughts!

No alternative is going to be free (condoms certainly are not, particularly female condoms), nor do they need to be based on a pill.  The reproductive technologies introduced in the last decade have been pregnancy based, with most of them working on hormonal levels and not at all addressing STI prevent -- so meanwhile, we&#039;re still stuck with the condom.  It leads to questioning where the priority of reproductive research lies... in offering more doctor-controlled birth control choices, or in finding low-cost, over-the-counter options that prevent STIs?   I think that we need more options that address that chasm of need: protection during sexual activity that prevents the spread of STIs that is an alternative to the condom.  Sure, condoms are cheap and have good rates of protection when used correctly -- but it doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s the only answer.  Acting like the condom is enough to curtail a pandemic isn&#039;t a rational or feasible solution.  I think that pushing research and development in STI prevention tools is important for those reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hill Rat, thanks for your thoughts!</p>
<p>No alternative is going to be free (condoms certainly are not, particularly female condoms), nor do they need to be based on a pill.  The reproductive technologies introduced in the last decade have been pregnancy based, with most of them working on hormonal levels and not at all addressing STI prevent &#8212; so meanwhile, we&#8217;re still stuck with the condom.  It leads to questioning where the priority of reproductive research lies&#8230; in offering more doctor-controlled birth control choices, or in finding low-cost, over-the-counter options that prevent STIs?   I think that we need more options that address that chasm of need: protection during sexual activity that prevents the spread of STIs that is an alternative to the condom.  Sure, condoms are cheap and have good rates of protection when used correctly &#8212; but it doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s the only answer.  Acting like the condom is enough to curtail a pandemic isn&#8217;t a rational or feasible solution.  I think that pushing research and development in STI prevention tools is important for those reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hill Rat</title>
		<link>http://www.coldspaghetti.org/blog/2008/12/13/12-stis-of-christmas/comment-page-1/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Hill Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coldspaghetti.org/blog/?p=3241#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>I hear you that much sexual activity isn&#039;t &quot;voluntary&quot; in the strictest sense of the word.  Women are often obliged to participate in sexual activity and the fact that they have so little power in the situation is what makes me wonder why you seem to think a pharmaceutical alternative to condoms would be better?  Even if it was a matter of taking a pill that cost $.01/day, that could be more than a poor woman in a developing nation can afford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you that much sexual activity isn&#8217;t &#8220;voluntary&#8221; in the strictest sense of the word.  Women are often obliged to participate in sexual activity and the fact that they have so little power in the situation is what makes me wonder why you seem to think a pharmaceutical alternative to condoms would be better?  Even if it was a matter of taking a pill that cost $.01/day, that could be more than a poor woman in a developing nation can afford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

